Friends and neighbors, 

Today on the Senate floor, Democrats brought forward Senate File 4067, which proposes broad gun bans and confiscations on commonly owned firearms. This legislation goes far beyond public safety and strikes directly at the constitutional freedoms of law-abiding Minnesotans.

Let’s be clear about what this bill does. Under proposals like Senate File 4067 and its companions, Minnesota would not just regulate firearms, it would ban the possession of widely owned, commonly used semiautomatic firearms, impose criminal penalties, and force citizens into compliance schemes simply for owning products they legally purchased. That is not a small policy change. It is a fundamental shift in the relationship between citizens and their government.

The bill raises a simple but profound question: Are we here to protect constitutional rights, or are we here to erode them when it becomes politically inconvenient?

The Second Amendment is not ambiguous. It does not say the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed… unless a legislature decides that certain firearms are unpopular. It is a guarantee, a safeguard against overreach, and a recognition that the right to self-defense belongs to the people, not to the state.

We all want safer communities. We all grieve when violence occurs. But we must be honest, this bill targets law-abiding citizens - hunters, sport shooters, veterans, and everyday Minnesotans - not the criminals. Criminals do not follow gun laws. They do not register firearms, and they do not comply with bans.

What this legislation does is place new burdens on the people who have done nothing wrong.

There is growing concern among Minnesotans about a broader pattern coming from the legislature. A pattern where rights are treated as negotiable, where government power expands and individual liberty concedes.

There is one silver lining in this bill. This debate is clarifying. It shows constituents exactly where their elected officials stand on fundamental freedoms. It brings into the open the question voters deserve an answer to: Will their representatives defend their rights, or do they believe those rights can be restricted, refined, or even revoked?

Our duty is not to chase headlines or respond with sweeping restrictions. Our duty is to uphold the Constitution, protect the rights of the people we serve, and ensure that in our pursuit of safety, we do not sacrifice the very freedoms that define us.

Andrew 

The U.S. Veterans Administration’s (VA) National Center for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) aims to support and educate those who experience trauma or PTSD-related symptoms. Tools and resources can help you on your wellness journey.

It can be challenging to support a friend or loved one with PTSD. It can strain relationships and create challenges at home. If you have a loved one with PTSD, there are resources to support you as well.

The first step in supporting someone with PTSD is understanding what it is. Learn the basics of PTSD. Once you understand the basics, you can begin to advocate for your loved one.

More information >>